No. 1 New advantage on application
1.For strong sunshine facing big sized building. A solution can offer 6500 cd higher brightness. And we can do longer length one with high brightness.
Brightness Comparation:
A solution: P6.25*6.25 pixel pitch 1.2 meter long: Above 6500cd brightness 1.8 meter long: Above 5000cd brightness |
B solution: P6.25*6.25 pixel pitch 1.2 meter long: above 5000cd only 1.8 meter long: much lower or can not do 1.8 meter long one. |
|
|
A Solution: P3.9*3.9 pixel pitch 1.2 meter long: Above 5000cd brightness 1.8 meter long: Above 4000cd brightness |
B solution: P3.9*3.9 pixel pitch 1.2 meter long: above 3000cd only 1.8 meter long: much lower or can not do 1.8 meter long one. |
Solution A cost is much lower than Solution B. For example for P3.9*3.9 pixel pitch. A solution cost is about only 55% or 60% for B solution. For big video wall screen project with far view distance, this means ender users can save much budget for same or close level performance.
Solution A can be with 1.8 meter long with still high brightness like 5500CD. This is the brightness which B solution can not easily reach or no chance to reach. For indoor low brightness project, A solution can even reach 2.4 meter length.
Other secret know how about installation will be shown after more conversation.